Using cWebHttpHandler with JSON instead of tWebValueTree: Difference between revisions
Created page with "From this forum post: https://support.dataaccess.com/Forums/showthread.php?68231-ToDo-Describe-call-mode-and-a-few-more-questions&p=371095#post371095 Reposting it here so I can quickly find it next time I need it (sorry, not sorry) It is indeed true that for most situations the tWebValueTree is not needed any more. ClientActions and ServerActions can now use JSON Handles or structs & arrays that are directly serialized. So when calling a server action you can now do th..." |
m formatting |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
It is indeed true that for most situations the tWebValueTree is not needed any more. ClientActions and ServerActions can now use JSON Handles or structs & arrays that are directly serialized. So when calling a server action you can now do the following: | It is indeed true that for most situations the tWebValueTree is not needed any more. ClientActions and ServerActions can now use JSON Handles or structs & arrays that are directly serialized. So when calling a server action you can now do the following: | ||
<source lang="javascript"> | |||
// Create data objects | // Create data objects | ||
var oData = { | var oData = { | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
alert(oEvent.sReturnValue); | alert(oEvent.sReturnValue); | ||
}); | }); | ||
</source> | |||
<source lang="dataflex"> | |||
// Function called as server action | // Function called as server action | ||
Function ProcessData2 Integer iParam1 Integer iParam2 Returns String | Function ProcessData2 Integer iParam1 Integer iParam2 Returns String | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
Function_Return tData.labels[3] | Function_Return tData.labels[3] | ||
End_Function | End_Function | ||
</source> | |||
So instead of ptActionData you use phoActionJsonData which gives a cJsonObject representing the data. Note that you do not have to cleanup this JSON Handle. | So instead of ptActionData you use phoActionJsonData which gives a cJsonObject representing the data. Note that you do not have to cleanup this JSON Handle. | ||
For client actions you can do the following: | For client actions you can do the following: | ||
<source lang="dataflex"> | |||
Procedure ProcessDataOnClient2 | Procedure ProcessDataOnClient2 | ||
// Send the client action | // Send the client action | ||
Line 57: | Line 58: | ||
Send ClientAction "processData2" aParams tData | Send ClientAction "processData2" aParams tData | ||
End_Procedure | End_Procedure | ||
</source> | |||
<source lang="javascript"> | |||
// Client action called with action data | // Client action called with action data | ||
processData2 : function(){ | processData2 : function(){ | ||
Line 70: | Line 72: | ||
alert(tData.datasets[0].strokeColor); | alert(tData.datasets[0].strokeColor); | ||
} | } | ||
</source> | |||
Note that ClientAction takes a variant parameter that it serializes to JSON. Both API's are backwards compatible so working with tWebValueTree still works. The value tree's are also still used for client web properties. | Note that ClientAction takes a variant parameter that it serializes to JSON. Both API's are backwards compatible so working with tWebValueTree still works. The value tree's are also still used for client web properties. |
Revision as of 23:10, 10 July 2023
From this forum post: https://support.dataaccess.com/Forums/showthread.php?68231-ToDo-Describe-call-mode-and-a-few-more-questions&p=371095#post371095
Reposting it here so I can quickly find it next time I need it (sorry, not sorry)
It is indeed true that for most situations the tWebValueTree is not needed any more. ClientActions and ServerActions can now use JSON Handles or structs & arrays that are directly serialized. So when calling a server action you can now do the following:
// Create data objects var oData = { labels : ["January","February","March","April","May","June","July"], datasets : [{ strokeColor : "rgba(220,220,220,1)", data : [65,59,90,81,56,55,40] },{ strokeColor : "rgba(151,187,205,1)", data : [28,48,40,19,96,27,100] }] }; // Send call to the server this.serverAction("ProcessData2", [ 2, 1 ], oData, function(oEvent){ alert(oEvent.sReturnValue); });
// Function called as server action Function ProcessData2 Integer iParam1 Integer iParam2 Returns String tActionData tData Handle hoJson // Retrieve and deserialize data Get phoActionJsonData to hoJson Get JsonToDataType of hoJson to tData Function_Return tData.labels[3] End_Function
So instead of ptActionData you use phoActionJsonData which gives a cJsonObject representing the data. Note that you do not have to cleanup this JSON Handle.
For client actions you can do the following:
Procedure ProcessDataOnClient2 // Send the client action String[] aParams tActionData tData // Generate some data Move "Januari" to tData.labels[0] Move "Februari" to tData.labels[1] Move "#FF0000" to tData.datasets[0].strokeColor Move 55 to tData.datasets[0].data[0] Move 88 to tData.datasets[0].data[0] // Call the client action Send ClientAction "processData2" aParams tData End_Procedure
// Client action called with action data processData2 : function(){ var tData; // Retrieve value tree and deserialize tData = this._tActionData; // Do something with the data alert(tData.datasets[0].strokeColor); }
Note that ClientAction takes a variant parameter that it serializes to JSON. Both API's are backwards compatible so working with tWebValueTree still works. The value tree's are also still used for client web properties.