Using cWebHttpHandler with JSON instead of tWebValueTree: Difference between revisions

Using cWebHttpHandler with JSON instead of tWebValueTree (view source)

32 bytes added , 11 July 2023

m

no edit summary

485

edits

Revision as of 00:10, 11 July 2023 (view source) Wil (talk \| contribs) m (formatting) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 00:13, 11 July 2023 (view source) Wil (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary
Line 75:		Line 75:

	Note that ClientAction takes a variant parameter that it serializes to JSON. Both API's are backwards compatible so working with tWebValueTree still works. The value tree's are also still used for client web properties.		Note that ClientAction takes a variant parameter that it serializes to JSON. Both API's are backwards compatible so working with tWebValueTree still works. The value tree's are also still used for client web properties.

			[[Category: Web Applications]]