Talk:Subversion: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 28: Line 28:
  *.pkd      --> Debug package include file
  *.pkd      --> Debug package include file
  *.prp      --> PRN file for the precompile
  *.prp      --> PRN file for the precompile
   
 
We don't want the following parts from the data files
  *.dat      --> Database file, don't add as it changes too much
*.k*      --> Index file, don't add
*.vld      --> Compressed database file, don't add
*.td      --> Mertech direct driver database cache file, don't add
*.cch      --> DAW direct driver database cache file, don't add
          
          
I'm wondering if we should remove .exe files as well as those can be compiled from scratch and don't really belong in a source repository in my opinion.
I'm wondering if we should remove .exe files as well as those can be compiled from scratch and don't really belong in a source repository in my opinion.
In my opinion a released binary should just be put available as download, not versioned.
In my opinion a released binary should just be put available as download, not versioned.
A database should be backed up, not versioned.
          
          
We could opt for having prn and prp files stored in the repository as they actually do contain valuable information and i know that Sture uses them for troubleshooting (me too sometimes)
We could opt for having prn and prp files stored in the repository as they actually do contain valuable information and i know that Sture uses them for troubleshooting (me too sometimes)
For the data files, at the very least we should version .def .tag .fd files as they are all plain text files and i think we _do_ want to know it if they change.
For the data files, at the very least we should version .def .tag .fd files as they are all plain text files and i think we _do_ want to know it if they change.
[[User:Hellboy1975|Matt]] 21:43, 20 February 2008 (CET)
Is there any benefit in keeping .res files in the repository?  We haven't seen the need to in house.
I agree with the ignore list, imo anything that can be generated easily I wouldn't want to store in subversion.
[[User:Wil|Wil]] 19:59, 5 March 2008 (CET) Agreed they should be generated on the client machine, so you can't compile without having the control installed. That is a good thing. Besides i don't think this format is still in use since VDF12.0 (or 12.1?)
But what to do with the files DDClasslist.xml and Classlist.xml ?
But what to do with the files DDClasslist.xml and Classlist.xml ?
[[User:Wil|Wil]] 19:59, 5 March 2008 (CET) We want them


===Why trunks and branches===
===Why trunks and branches===