485
edits
No edit summary |
|||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
For the data files, at the very least we should version .def .tag .fd files as they are all plain text files and i think we _do_ want to know it if they change. | For the data files, at the very least we should version .def .tag .fd files as they are all plain text files and i think we _do_ want to know it if they change. | ||
[[User:Hellboy1975|Matt]] 21:43, 20 February 2008 (CET) | |||
Is there any benefit in keeping .res files in the repository? We haven't seen the need to in house. | Is there any benefit in keeping .res files in the repository? We haven't seen the need to in house. | ||
I agree with the ignore list, imo anything that can be generated easily I wouldn't want to store in subversion. | I agree with the ignore list, imo anything that can be generated easily I wouldn't want to store in subversion. | ||
[[User:Wil|Wil]] 19:59, 5 March 2008 (CET) Agreed they should be generated on the client machine, so you can't compile without having the control installed. That is a good thing. Besides i don't think this format is still in use since VDF12.0 (or 12.1?) | |||
But what to do with the files DDClasslist.xml and Classlist.xml ? | But what to do with the files DDClasslist.xml and Classlist.xml ? | ||
[[User:Wil|Wil]] 19:59, 5 March 2008 (CET) We want them | |||
===Why trunks and branches=== | ===Why trunks and branches=== |