Talk:Subversion: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 44: Line 44:
For the data files, at the very least we should version .def .tag .fd files as they are all plain text files and i think we _do_ want to know it if they change.
For the data files, at the very least we should version .def .tag .fd files as they are all plain text files and i think we _do_ want to know it if they change.


[[User:Hellboy1975|Matt]] 21:43, 20 February 2008 (CET)
Is there any benefit in keeping .res files in the repository?  We haven't seen the need to in house.
Is there any benefit in keeping .res files in the repository?  We haven't seen the need to in house.
I agree with the ignore list, imo anything that can be generated easily I wouldn't want to store in subversion.  
I agree with the ignore list, imo anything that can be generated easily I wouldn't want to store in subversion.  
[[User:Wil|Wil]] 19:59, 5 March 2008 (CET) Agreed they should be generated on the client machine, so you can't compile without having the control installed. That is a good thing. Besides i don't think this format is still in use since VDF12.0 (or 12.1?)


But what to do with the files DDClasslist.xml and Classlist.xml ?
But what to do with the files DDClasslist.xml and Classlist.xml ?
[[User:Wil|Wil]] 19:59, 5 March 2008 (CET) We want them


===Why trunks and branches===
===Why trunks and branches===